Showing posts with label Library Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Library Science. Show all posts

Friday, 3 October 2025

Covers the full form (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom)





DIKW is a conceptual hierarchy that shows how raw facts become meaningful insights and finally lead to judicious action. Each level adds context, interpretation, and judgment.


1) Data

Raw facts without context.

  • Examples: 25, 32, 47; Delhi, Rain, 2025; sensor output 45°C.
  • LIS: Unprocessed circulation logs, accession numbers, and individual keywords.

Unprocessed • Objective • Unorganized


2) Information

Processed data with context and meaning.

  • Examples: “Temperature in Delhi is 45°C today”, monthly rainfall chart.
  • LIS: A catalog record; a report of daily footfall by hour.

Context • Organized • Useful


3) Knowledge

Internalized information understood through experience.

  • Examples: Knowing 45°C is dangerous; understanding monsoon patterns.
  • LIS: A librarian’s expertise to recommend the best resource for a user’s query.

Understanding • Experience • Application


4) Wisdom

Judicious application of knowledge with foresight and ethics.

  • Examples: Advising heatwave safety; planning sustainable water usage.
  • LIS: Policy-making for equitable access; long-term collection strategy.

Judgment • Foresight • Ethics


Quick Comparison Table

Level Key Question What It Adds LIS Example
Data Raw values Click logs, issue/return timestamps
Information What? Context & organization Monthly circulation report by subject
Knowledge How? Interpretation & patterns Understanding peak hours & user needs
Wisdom Why? Judgment & action Adjust staffing, acquire targeted collections

The DIKW Pyramid (Why → How → What → Facts)

        Wisdom (Why?)
       ─────────────────
        Knowledge (How?)
       ─────────────────
        Information (What?)
       ─────────────────
        Data (Facts)
    

Exam Tip: Remember the flow: Data → Information → Knowledge → Wisdom. Each level is not just more data—it's more context, meaning, and judgment.


DIKW in Libraries & Knowledge Management

  • Collection Development: Use issue data (Data) → subject trends (Info) → reader profiles (Knowledge) → balanced, inclusive policies (Wisdom).
  • Reference Services: Query logs (Data) → FAQ topics (Info) → staff training focus (Knowledge) → proactive user-education programs (Wisdom).
  • Digital Libraries: Metadata records (Data) → curated subject guides (Info) → discovery strategies (Knowledge) → open access & equity decisions (Wisdom).

FAQ

Is information always “better” than data?

No. Information is data in context. If the context is wrong or misleading, information quality suffers. High-quality data and appropriate context both matter.


Can knowledge exist without information?

Practical know-how can be tacit (in people’s heads), but it arises from repeated exposure to information and experiences over time.

Where do ethics enter the DIKW model?

Ethics become critical at the wisdom level—when decisions affect people and communities (e.g., privacy, inclusivity, accessibility).


Summary: DIKW shows how libraries transform raw records into meaningful services and wise policies. It’s a ladder from facts to action.




Monday, 15 September 2025

Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Thursday, 28 August 2025

Thursday, 21 August 2025

IFLA and UNESCO in Library and Information Science



Monday, 11 August 2025

Monday, 28 July 2025

Saturday, 19 July 2025

Plagiarism: Concept, Types, and How to Avoid It



Wednesday, 16 July 2025

Monday, 7 July 2025

FRBR – Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records



Sunday, 6 July 2025

ISBD vs AACR vs MARC21 – A Comparative Study




Wednesday, 2 July 2025

Tuesday, 1 July 2025

AACR – Anglo-American Cataloguing Rule




AACR, or Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, is a foundational cataloguing standard used by libraries around the world, especially in English-speaking countries. It provides detailed rules for the descriptive cataloguing of library materials and ensures uniformity across catalog entries.

📚 History and Versions

VersionYearNotes
AACR1967First edition, US-UK collaboration
AACR21978Widely adopted, structured around material type
AACR2R2002Revised version to address electronic resources
Replaced byRDAResource Description and Access (2010 onwards)

🔍 Key Features of AACR2

  • Guidelines for cataloguing books, serials, AV materials, maps, and digital content
  • Uses ISBD punctuation for bibliographic consistency
  • Focuses on card catalog structure but adaptable to MARC21 and OPAC systems
  • Separates description and entry elements

🔁 AACR2 vs RDA – Key Differences

AspectAACR2RDA
Development BasisISBD and the card catalog modelBased on FRBR & FRAD models
Resource TypesFormat-basedContent-based, flexible for digital
Data EntryCataloger’s judgment-basedStructured metadata for interoperability
Used ForPrint & early digitalDigital, linked data, web applications

✅ Why AACR Still Matters

  • Foundation of modern cataloguing education
  • Still in use where RDA is not adopted
  • Core part of UGC NET, KVS, DSSSB, LIS syllabi




📲 Connect with Us:




Friday, 27 June 2025

📘 Delivery of Books and Newspapers (Public Libraries) Act, 1954



Thursday, 26 June 2025

Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC): Organizing Knowledge with Numbers




Saturday, 14 June 2025

National Knowledge Commission & National Mission on Libraries